Small cell osteosarcoma versus fusion-driven round cell sarcomas of bone: retrospective clinical, radiological, pathological, and (epi)genetic comparison with clinical implications.

Small cell osteosarcoma (SCOS), a variant of conventional high-grade osteosarcoma (COS), may mimic fusion-driven round cell sarcomas (FDRCS) by overlapping clinico-radiological and histomorphological/immunohistochemical characteristics, hampering accurate diagnosis and consequently proper therapy. We retrospectively analyzed decalcified formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of 18 bone tumors primarily diagnosed as SCOS by methylation profiling, fusion gene analysis, and immunohistochemistry.In eight cases, the diagnosis of SCOS was maintained, and in 10 cases it was changed into FDRCS, including three Ewing sarcomas (EWSR1::FLI1 in two cases and no identified fusion gene in the third case), two sarcomas with BCOR alterations (KMT2D::BCOR, CCNB3::BCOR, respectively), three mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (HEY1::NCOA2 in two cases and one case with insufficient RNA quality), and two sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas (FUS::CREBL3 and EWSR1 rearrangement, respectively).Histologically, SCOS usually possessed more pleomorphic cells in contrast to the FDRCS showing mainly monomorphic cellular features. However, osteoid was seen in the latter tumors as well, often associated with slight pleomorphism. Also, the immunohistochemical profile (CD99, SATB2, and BCOR) overlapped.Clinically and radiologically, similarities between SCOS and FDRCS were observed, with by imaging only minimal presence or lack of (mineralized) osteoid in most of the SCOSs.In conclusion, discrimination of SCOS, epigenetically related to COS, versus FDRCS of bone can be challenging but is important due to different biology and therefore therapeutic strategies. Methylation profiling is a reliable and robust diagnostic test especially on decalcified FFPE material. Subsequent fusion gene analysis and/or use of specific immunohistochemical surrogate markers can be used to substantiate the diagnosis.

Disruption of the TP53 locus in osteosarcoma leads to TP53 promoter gene fusions and restoration of parts of the TP53 signalling pathway.

TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. This gene shows not only loss-of-function mutations but also recurrent missense mutations with gain-of-function activity. We have studied the primary bone malignancy osteosarcoma, which harbours one of the most rearranged genomes of all cancers. This is odd since it primarily affects children and adolescents who have not lived the long life thought necessary to accumulate massive numbers of mutations. In osteosarcoma, TP53 is often disrupted by structural variants. Here, we show through combined whole-genome and transcriptome analyses of 148 osteosarcomas that TP53 structural variants commonly result in loss of coding parts of the gene while simultaneously preserving and relocating the promoter region. The transferred TP53 promoter region is fused to genes previously implicated in cancer development. Paradoxically, these erroneously upregulated genes are significantly associated with the TP53 signalling pathway itself. This suggests that while the classical tumour suppressor activities of TP53 are lost, certain parts of the TP53 signalling pathway that are necessary for cancer cell survival and proliferation are retained. In line with this, our data suggest that transposition of the TP53 promoter is an early event that allows for a new normal state of genome-wide rearrangements in osteosarcoma. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Osteosarcomas With Few Chromosomal Alterations or Adult Onset Are Genetically Heterogeneous.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy, often detected in children and adolescents and commonly associated with TP53 alterations along with a high number of chromosomal rearrangements. However, osteosarcoma can affect patients of any age, and some tumors display less genetic complexity. Besides TP53 variants, data on key driving mutations are lacking for many osteosarcomas, particularly those affecting adults. To detect osteosarcoma-specific alterations, we screened transcriptomic and genomic sequencing and copy number data from 150 bone tumors originally diagnosed as osteosarcomas. To increase the precision in gene fusion detection, we developed a bioinformatic tool denoted as NAFuse, which extracts gene fusions that are verified at both the genomic and transcriptomic levels. Apart from the already reported genetic subgroups of osteosarcoma with TP53 structural variants, or MDM2 and/or CDK4 amplification, we did not identify any recurrent genetic driver that signifies the remaining cases. Among the plethora of mutations identified, we found genetic alterations characteristic of, or similar to, those of other bone and soft tissue tumors in 8 cases. These mutations were found in tumors with relatively few other genetic alterations or in adults. Due to the lack of clinical context and available tissue, we can question the diagnosis only on a genetic basis. However, our findings support the notion that osteosarcomas with few chromosomal alterations or adult onset seem genetically distinct from conventional osteosarcomas of children and adolescents.

EWSR1::WT1 Fusions in Neoplasms Other Than Conventional Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor: Three Tumors Occurring Outside the Female Genital Tract.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a high-grade, primitive round cell sarcoma classically associated with prominent desmoplastic stroma, coexpression of keratin and desmin, and a characteristic EWSR1::WT1 gene fusion. DSRCT typically arises in the abdominopelvic cavity of young males with diffuse peritoneal spread and poor overall survival. Although originally considered to be pathognomonic for DSRCT, EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions have recently been detected in rare tumors lacking the characteristic morphologic and immunohistochemical features of DSRCT. Here, we report 3 additional cases of neoplasms other than conventional DSCRCT with EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions that occurred outside the female genital tract. Two occurred in the abdominopelvic cavities of a 27-year-old man and a 12-year-old girl, whereas the third arose in the axillary soft tissue of an 85-year-old man. All cases lacked prominent desmoplastic stroma and were instead solid and cystic with peripheral fibrous pseudocapsules and occasional intervening fibrous septa. Necrosis was either absent (1/3) or rare (2/3), and mitotic activity was low (<1 to 3 per 10 hpf). In immunohistochemical studies, there was expression of smooth muscle actin (3/3) and desmin (3/3), rare to focal reactivity for EMA (2/3), and variable expression of CK AE1/AE3 (1/3). Myogenin and MyoD1 were negative, and C-terminus-specific WT1 was positive in both cases tested (2/2). All 3 tumors followed a more indolent clinical course with 2 cases demonstrating no evidence of disease at 20 and 44 months after resection. The patient from case 3 died of other causes at 14 months with no evidence of recurrence. DNA methylation profiling showed that the 3 cases clustered with DSRCT; however, they demonstrated fewer copy number variations with 2 cases having a flat profile (0% copy number variation). Differential methylation analysis with hierarchical clustering further showed variation between the 3 cases and conventional DSRCT. Although further study is needed, our results, in addition to previous reports, suggest that EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions occur in rare and seemingly distinctive tumors other than conventional DSRCT with indolent behavior. Proper classification of these unusual soft tissue tumors with EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions requires direct correlation with tumor morphology and clinical behavior, which is essential to avoid overtreatment with aggressive chemotherapy.

Zoledronic Acid Add-on Therapy for Standard-Risk Ewing Sarcoma Patients in the Ewing 2008R1 Trial.

PURPOSE: The phase III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized Ewing 2008R1 trial (EudraCT2008-003658-13) was conducted in 12 countries to evaluate the effect of zoledronic acid (ZOL) maintenance therapy compared with no add-on regarding event-free survival (EFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) in standard-risk Ewing sarcoma (EWS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had localized EWS with either good histologic response to induction chemotherapy and/or small tumors (<200 mL). Patients received six cycles of VIDE induction and eight cycles of VAI (male) or eight cycles of VAC (female) consolidation. ZOL treatment started parallel to the sixth consolidation cycle. Randomization was stratified by tumor site (pelvis/other). The two-sided adaptive inverse-normal four-stage design (planned sample size 448 patients, significance level 5%, power 80%) was changed after the first interim analysis using the Müller-Schäfer method. RESULTS: Between April 2010 and November 2018, 284 patients were randomized (142 ZOL/142 no add-on). With a median follow-up of 3.9 years, EFS was not significantly different between ZOL and no add-on group in the adaptive design (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.43-1.28, P = 0.27, intention-to-treat). Three-year EFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 77.7%-90.8%) for ZOL vs. 81.7% (95% CI, 75.2%-88.8%) for no add-on. Results were similar in the per-protocol collective. OS was not different between groups. The 3-year OS was 92.8% (95% CI, 88.4%-97.5%) for ZOL and 94.6% (95% CI, 90.9%-98.6%) for no add-on. Noticeable more renal, neurologic, and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed for ZOL (P < 0.05). Severe renal toxicities occurred more often in the ZOL arm (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with standard-risk localized EWS, there is no additional benefit from maintenance treatment with ZOL.

Histomorphometric Analysis of 38 Giant Cell Tumors of Bone after Recurrence as Compared to Changes Following Denosumab Treatment.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an osteolytic tumor driven by an H3F3A-mutated mononuclear cell with the accumulation of osteoclastic giant cells. We analyzed tissue from 13 patients with recurrence and 25 patients with denosumab therapy, including two cases of malignant transformation. We found a decrease in the total number of cells (p = 0.03), but not in the individual cell populations when comparing primary and recurrence. The patients treated with denosumab showed induction of osteoid formation increasing during therapy. The total number of cells was reduced (p < 0.0001) and the number of H3F3A-mutated tumor cells decreased (p = 0.0001), while the H3F3A wild-type population remained stable. The KI-67 proliferation rate dropped from 10% to 1% and Runx2- and SATB2-positive cells were reduced. The two cases of malignant transformation revealed a loss of the H3F3A-mutated cells, while the KI-67 rate increased. Changes in RUNX2 and SATB2 expression were higher in one sarcoma, while in the other RUNX2 was decreased and SATB2-positive cells were completely lost. We conclude that denosumab has a strong impact on the morphology of GCTB. KI-67, RUNX2 and SATB2 expression differed depending on the benign or malignant course of the tumor under denosumab therapy.

DNA methylation profile discriminates sporadic giant cell granulomas of the jaws and cherubism from their giant cell-rich histological mimics.

Sporadic giant cell granulomas (GCGs) of the jaws and cherubism-associated giant cell lesions share histopathological features and microscopic diagnosis alone can be challenging. Additionally, GCG can morphologically closely resemble other giant cell-rich lesions, including non-ossifying fibroma (NOF), aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC), giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), and chondroblastoma. The epigenetic basis of these giant cell-rich tumours is unclear and DNA methylation profiling has been shown to be clinically useful for the diagnosis of other tumour types. Therefore, we aimed to assess the DNA methylation profile of central and peripheral sporadic GCG and cherubism to test whether DNA methylation patterns can help to distinguish them. Additionally, we compared the DNA methylation profile of these lesions with those of other giant cell-rich mimics to investigate if the microscopic similarities extend to the epigenetic level. DNA methylation analysis was performed for central (n = 10) and peripheral (n = 10) GCG, cherubism (n = 6), NOF (n = 10), ABC (n = 16), GCTB (n = 9), and chondroblastoma (n = 10) using the Infinium Human Methylation EPIC Chip. Central and peripheral sporadic GCG and cherubism share a related DNA methylation pattern, with those of peripheral GCG and cherubism appearing slightly distinct, while central GCG shows overlap with both of the former. NOF, ABC, GCTB, and chondroblastoma, on the other hand, have distinct methylation patterns. The global and enhancer-associated CpG DNA methylation values showed a similar distribution pattern among central and peripheral GCG and cherubism, with cherubism showing the lowest and peripheral GCG having the highest median values. By contrast, promoter regions showed a different methylation distribution pattern, with cherubism showing the highest median values. In conclusion, DNA methylation profiling is currently not capable of clearly distinguishing sporadic and cherubism-associated giant cell lesions. Conversely, it could discriminate sporadic GCG of the jaws from their giant cell-rich mimics (NOF, ABC, GCTB, and chondroblastoma).

Solitary pulmonary metastases at first recurrence of osteosarcoma: Presentation, treatment, and survival of 219 patients of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate patient and tumour characteristics, treatment and their impact on survival in patients with a solitary pulmonary metastasis at first relapse of high-grade osteosarcoma. PROCEDURE: Two-hundred and nineteen consecutive patients who had achieved a complete surgical remission and then developed a solitary pulmonary metastasis at first recurrence of high-grade osteosarcoma were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred and three (94.9%) of 214 patients achieved a second complete remission. After a median time from initial diagnosis of osteosarcoma to first relapse of 2.3 years (range, 0.3-18.8 years), actuarial post-relapse overall survival after 2 and 5 years was 72.0% and 51.2%. Post-relapse event-free survival was 39.1% and 31.1%. Median follow-up time was 3.2 years (range, 0.1-29.4 years). A longer time until first relapse and diagnosis due to imaging were positive prognostic factors in uni- and multivariate analyses, as were a second complete surgical remission and, in regard to death, the absence of a subsequent relapse. The use of salvage chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not associated with patient outcomes, nor was the surgical approach (thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy) nor the exploration (uni- vs. bilateral). CONCLUSION: Approximately half of the patients who experience a solitary pulmonary relapse at first recurrence of osteosarcoma remain alive 5 years after this first relapse. Only one third will remain disease-free. A complete surgical resection of the lesion is essential for long-term survival while relapse chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival. Innovative therapies are required to improve outcomes.

DNA Methylation Profiling Distinguishes Adamantinoma-Like Ewing Sarcoma From Conventional Ewing Sarcoma.

Adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma (ALES) has traditionally been considered a variant of Ewing sarcoma because it generally harbors EWSR1::FLI1 fusions despite showing diffuse positivity for keratins and p40. However, it has become increasingly recognized that different tumors can have identical translocations, including shared fusions between carcinomas and sarcomas, raising questions as to whether ALES might represent a separate entity. Using methylation profiling, we further explored the relationship between Ewing sarcoma and ALES. The archives of multiple institutions were searched for candidate cases of ALES. DNA methylation profiling was performed and results were compared to corresponding data from conventional Ewing sarcoma. Twelve cases of ALES (5 previously reported) were identified in 10 men and 2 women (aged 20-72 years; median age, 41.5 years). Cases included tumors arising in the parotid gland (3), sinonasal cavity (2), submandibular gland (2), thyroid gland (1), neck (1), gingiva (1), hypopharynx (1), and mandible (1). Histologic review consistently showed sheets and nests of basaloid cells within a fibromyxoid or hyalinized stroma. All tumors were positive for at least 1 keratin and CD99 expression, whereas all 10 cases tested were positive for p63 or p40; S100 protein expression was noted in 2 cases. Cases harbored either EWSR1::FLI1 fusions (n = 6), FUS::FLI1 fusions (n = 1), and/or EWSR1 rearrangements (n = 6). Methylation profiling was successful in 11/12 cases evaluated. Unsupervised clustering and dimensionality reduction (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) of DNA methylation data revealed a distinct methylation cluster for all 11 cases, including the tumor with the FUS::FLI1 fusion, which clearly segregated them from the conventional Ewing sarcoma. Follow-up (n = 11, 1-154 months) revealed that 4 patients experienced recurrence and 6 developed metastatic disease. ALES demonstrates a distinct methylation signature from conventional Ewing sarcoma. This finding adds to the distinctive immunoprofile of ALES, suggesting that these 2 tumors should be considered distinct entities rather than histologic extremes of the same disease.

Superficial mesenchymal tumours expressing epithelial markers on immunohistochemistry: Diagnostic clues and pitfalls.

The diagnosis of mesenchymal neoplasms arising in the superficial soft tissue can be challenging as some entities are rare and show overlapping features. Moreover, the spectrum of mesenchymal tumours has expanded recently to include potential new entities, some of which have been described after the 5th edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of soft tissue and bone tumours published in 2020. In the skin and superficial soft tissue, tumours of epidermal, melanocytic and appendageal origin are more commonly encountered than mesenchymal neoplasms. However, specific entities from the latter category can occasionally express epithelial markers on immunohistochemistry, some of them in a strong and diffuse manner. It is therefore crucial to be aware of diagnostic pitfalls when encountering cytokeratin positivity in superficial soft tissue neoplasms. This article provides an overview on the differential diagnosis of these mesenchymal tumours that can sporadically occur also in the skin, including myoepithelial neoplasms, epithelioid sarcoma, keratin positive giant cell tumour of soft tissue / xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumour, superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumour / PRDM10-rearranged soft tissue tumour, and perineurioma.

[The new WHO classification of jaw tumours]. / Die neue WHO-Klassifikation der Kiefertumoren.

Maxillofacial tumours cover a broad spectrum of lesions, including neoplasms, hamartomatous changes and developmental disorders. Since the beginning of 2022, a beta version of the 5th edition of the WHO classification for head and neck tumours has been available online, and a print version is expected to be published in mid-2023. From a conceptual point of view, little has been changed compared to the 4th edition; the sort order of lesions is more rigorously arranged according to benign and malignant behaviour and identical tumour types are no longer described redundantly in different chapters depending on their location. The diagnostic criteria are now summarized as "essential" and "desirable", and in addition to the clinical features, imaging is now also incorporated, providing an interdisciplinary approach to the classification. A few new entities are included for the first time. This article gives an overview of the main changes introduced in the new WHO classification with a special emphasis on fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial skeleton.

Prominent osteolysis in the maxilla: case report of an odontogenic fibroma mimicking a cyst.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic fibroma (OF) is a rare benign odontogenic tumor of ectomesenchymal origin, mostly affecting the tooth-bearing portions of the jaws in middle-aged patients. Whilst small lesions tend to be clinically asymptomatic, varying unspecific clinical symptoms occur with an increase in size and may mimic odontogenic or other maxillofacial bone tumors, cysts, or fibro-osseous lesions of the jaws. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old female patient presented with a hard, non-fluctuating protrusion in the vestibule of the upper right maxilla. It was visualized on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as space-occupying osteolysis with the displacement of the floor and facial wall of the maxillary sinus, mimicking a cyst-like lesion. The tissue was surgically removed and identified as an OF in the histopathological examination. One year after the surgery, restitution of regular sinus anatomy and physiological intraoral findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This case report emphasizes that rare entities, like the maxillary OF presented, often demonstrate nonspecific clinical and radiological findings. Nevertheless, clinicians need to consider rare entities as possible differential diagnoses and plan the treatment accordingly. Histopathological examination is essential to conclude the diagnosis. OF rarely recur after proper enucleation.

NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry and methylome profiling in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: additional diagnostic value for a well-defined disease?

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) is a rare and highly aggressive tumour of soft tissue and bone that is defined by an underlying and highly specific fusion transcript involving HEY1 and NCOA2. Histologically, the tumours show a biphasic appearance consisting of an undifferentiated blue and round cell component as well as islands of highly differentiated cartilage. Particularly in core needle biopsies, the chondromatous component can be missed and the non-specific morphology and immunophenotype of the round cell component can cause diagnostic challenges. We applied NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry which was recently reported as a highly specific marker as well as methylome and copy number profiling to a set of 45 well characterised MCS cases to evaluate their potential diagnostic value. Methylome profiling revealed a highly distinct cluster for MCS. Notably, the findings were reproducible also when analysing the round cell and cartilaginous component separately. Furthermore, four outliers were identified by methylome profiling for which the diagnosis had to be revised. NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry showed positivity in 36% of tumours, the majority of which was rather focal and weak. Taken together, NKX3.1 expression showed a low sensitivity but a high specificity in our analysis. Methylome profiling on the other hand represents a sensitive, specific and reliable tool to support the diagnosis of MCS, particularly if only the round cell component is obtained in a biopsy and the diagnosis is not suspected. Furthermore, it can aid in confirming the diagnosis in case RNA sequencing for the HEY1::NCOA2 fusion transcript is not available.

TAF15::NR4A3 gene fusion identifies a morphologically distinct subset of extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma mimicking myoepithelial tumors.

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare sarcoma of uncertain differentiation predominantly arising in deep soft tissue. Its conventional morphologic appearance manifests as a relatively well-circumscribed, multilobular tumor composed of uniform short spindle-to-ovoid primitive mesenchymal cells with deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in anastomosing cords within abundant myxoid matrix. The genetic hallmark of EMC has long been considered to be pathognomonic gene rearrangements involving NR4A3, which when fused to TAF15, often have high-grade morphology with increased cellularity, moderate to severe cytologic atypia, and rhabdoid cytomorphology. Herein, we describe two cases of EMC with TAF15::NR4A3 fusion that appear morphologically distinct from both conventional and high-grade EMC. Both cases had an unusual biphasic appearance and showed diffuse positivity for p63, mimicking myoepithelial tumors. DNA methylation profiling demonstrated that both cases clearly cluster with EMC, indicating that they most likely represent morphologically distinct variants of EMC. The clinical significance and prognostic impact of this morphologic variance remains to be determined. Molecular testing, including DNA methylation profiling, can help to confirm the diagnosis and avoid confusion with mimics; it adds another layer of data to support expanding the morphologic spectrum of EMC.

Psammomatoid Ossifying Fibroma Is Defined by SATB2 Rearrangement.

Psammomatoid ossifying fibroma (PsOF), also known as juvenile PsOF, is a benign fibro-osseous neoplasm predominantly affecting the extragnathic bones, particularly the frontal and ethmoid bones, with a preference for adolescents and young adults. The clinical and morphologic features of PsOF may overlap with those of other fibro-osseous lesions, and additional molecular markers would help increase diagnostic accuracy. Because identical chromosomal breakpoints at bands Xq26 and 2q33 have been described in 3 cases of PsOF located in the orbita, we aimed to identify the exact genes involved in these chromosomal breakpoints and determine their frequency in PsOF using transcriptome sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We performed whole RNA transcriptome sequencing on frozen tissue in 2 PsOF index cases and identified a fusion transcript involving SATB2, located on chromosome 2q33.1, and AL513487.1, located on chromosome Xq26, in one of the cases. The fusion was validated using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and SATB2 FISH. The fusion lead to a truncated protein product losing most of the functional domains. Subsequently, we analyzed an additional 24 juvenile PsOFs, 8 juvenile trabecular ossifying fibromas (JTOFs), and 11 cemento-ossifying fibromas (COFs) for SATB2 using FISH and found evidence of SATB2 gene rearrangements in 58% (7 of 12) of the evaluable PsOF cases but not in any of the evaluable JTOF (n = 7) and COF (n = 7) cases. A combination of SATB2 immunofluorescence and a 2-color SATB2 FISH in our index case revealed that most tumor cells harboring the rearrangement lacked SATB2 expression. Using immunohistochemistry, 65% of PsOF, 100% of JTOF, and 100% of COF cases showed moderate or strong staining for SATB2. In these cases, we observed a mosaic pattern of expression with >25% of the spindle cells in between the bone matrix, with osteoblasts and osteocytes being positive for SATB2. Interestingly, 35% (8 of 23) of PsOFs, in contrast to JTOFs and COFs, showed SATB2 expression in <5% of cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report that shows the involvement of SATB2 in the development of a neoplastic lesion. In this study, we have showed that SATB2 rearrangement is a recurrent molecular alteration that appears to be highly specific for PsOF. Our findings support that PsOF is not only morphologically and clinically but also genetically distinct from JTOF and COF.

Cemento-osseous dysplasia is caused by RAS-MAPK activation.

Cemento-osseous dysplasia (COD) belongs to the spectrum of benign fibro-osseous lesions occurring exclusively in the tooth-bearing areas of the jaws. Depending on site and extent of involvement, periapical, focal and florid subtypes can be distinguished that share an identical histomorphology. Most cases are asymptomatic and follow a self-limited course requiring no specific treatment. Over time, lesions progressively mineralise while the cellularity decreases. However, the molecular pathogenesis of COD, has not yet been explored. We analysed a series of 31 COD samples by targeted sequencing and detected pathogenic hotspot mutations involving the RAS-MAPK signalling pathway in 5/18 evaluable cases (28%). The mutations were found in the BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, and FGFR3 genes. Our findings suggest that COD is driven by RAS-MAPK activation; however, the mechanism underlying the spontaneous growth arrest typically occuring in most of the lesions remains elusive.

RREB1::MRTFB fusion-positive extra-glossal mesenchymal neoplasms: A series of five cases expanding their anatomic distribution and highlighting significant morphological and phenotypic diversity.

The RREB1::MRTFB (former RREB1::MKL2) fusion characterizes ectomesenchymal chondromyxoid tumors (EMCMT) of the tongue. Only five molecularly confirmed extra-glossal EMCMT cases have been reported recently; all occurring at head and neck or mediastinal sites. We herein describe five new cases including the first two extracranial/extrathoracic cases. The tumors occurred in three male and two female patients with an age ranging from 18 to 61 years (median, 28). Three tumors were located in the head and neck (jaw, parapharyngeal space, and nasopharyngeal wall) and two in the soft tissue (inguinal and presacral). The tumor size ranged from 3.3 to 20 cm (median, 7). Treatment was surgical without adjuvant treatment in all cases. Two cases were disease-free at 5 and 17 months; other cases were lost to follow-up. Histologically, the soft tissue cases shared a predominant fibromyxoid appearance, but with variable cytoarchitectural pattern (cellular perineurioma-like whorls and storiform pattern in one case and large polygonal granular cells embedded within a chondromyxoid stroma in the other). Two tumors (inguinal and parapharyngeal) showed spindled to ovoid and round cells with a moderately to highly cellular nondescript pattern. One sinonasal tumor closely mimicked nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma (NCMH). Mitotic activity was low (0-5 mitoses/10 hpfs). Immunohistochemical findings were heterogeneous with variable expression of S100 (2/5), EMA (2/3), CD34 (1/4), desmin (1/4), and GFAP (1/3). Targeted RNA sequencing revealed the same RREB1::MRTFB fusion in all cases, with exon 8 of RREB1 being fused to exon 11 of MRTFB. This study expands the topographic spectrum of RREB1::MRTFB fusion-positive mesenchymal neoplasms, highlighting a significant morphological and phenotypic diversity. Overall, RREB1::MRTFB-rearranged neoplasms seem to fall into two subcategories: tumors with lobulated, chondroid, or myxochondroid epithelioid morphology (Cases 2 and 3) and those with more undifferentiated hypercellular spindle cell phenotype (Cases 1, 4, and 5). Involvement of extracranial/extrathoracic sites and the NCMH-like pattern are novel. The biology of these likely indolent or benign tumors remains to be verified in the future.

Osteosarcoma pre-diagnosed as another tumor: a report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS).

PURPOSE: The course of osteosarcoma patients primarily treated as such has been well described. Little, however, is known about patients who were primarily treated assuming a different tumor diagnosis. METHODS: The database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group COSS was searched (4.435 primary high-grade central osteosarcomas registered prior to 01/01/21). A different tumor entity had to have been assumed for at least one month after the initial diagnostic procedure before the correct diagnosis of osteosarcoma was finally made. Identified patients were analyzed for demographic, tumor-, and treatment-related factors as well as for survival outcomes. RESULTS: 37 patients were identified. They were a median of 19.7 (2.7-60.4) years old at first presentation and were more likely to be females than males (23:14). Bone cysts (n = 8), giant cell tumor of bone (n = 6), and osteoblastoma (n = 6) were the most frequent of 29/37 (78%) benign, chondrosarcoma and its variants (n = 6) the most frequent of 8/37 (22%) malignant original diagnoses. Tumors affected the extremities in 23 (62%), the trunk in 11 (30%), and the craniofacial bones in 3 (8%). Only one patient received systemic treatment while assuming the different diagnosis (1/37, 3%). The median time until the correct diagnosis of osteosarcoma was made was 8 months (range: 1 month-14.1 years). At that time, 6/37 (16%) presented with metastatic disease. All patients went on to receive chemotherapy, 17/37 (46%) neo-adjuvantly. Histologic response was only evaluated in 13/17 (76%) patients and was good (< 10% viable tumor) in only 4/13 (31%) patients. In 31/37 (84%) patients, a surgically complete resection of all macroscopically identified tumor manifestations could be achieved. Five-year overall and event-free survival rates at 5 years were 50.2% (standard error: 8.6%) and 42.6% (8.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Osteosarcoma may initially be misdiagnosed and hence subjected to inappropriate treatment including misguided surgery. Once diagnosed correctly, some of the affected patients may still be cured if finally treated according to modern osteosarcoma standards.